Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Anna St. John v. Lisa Jones, et al
as 21-2292
Plaintiff / Appellee: Horacio Torres Bonilla, Lisa Jones and Kristoffer Yee
Appellant: Anna St. John, State of Montana, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellee: Monsanto Company
James Carson, et al v. Steve Simon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3139
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Robert LaRose, Gary Severson, Teresa Maples and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eric Lucero and James Carson
Defendant / Appellee: Steve Simon, Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota, in his official capacity
Not Yet Classified: State of Nevada, District of Columbia, State of New Mexico and others
Type: Civil Rights Voting
State of North Dakota, et al v. U.S. EPA, et al
as 15-2552
Petitioner: State of North Dakota, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Respondent: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Regina McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Melissa Todd v. Canadian Pacific Railway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1698
Plaintiff - Appellant: Melissa Todd
Defendant - Appellee: Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and others
Intervenor: United States
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: State of New Hampshire, State of Utah, State of Indiana and others
Bobby Smith, et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant: Bobby Smith and Mary Smith
Defendant - Appellee: Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and others
Intervenor: United States
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: State of New Hampshire, State of Utah, State of Indiana and others
Ray Lakoduk v. Canadian Pacific Railway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1699
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ray Lakoduk
Defendant - Appellee: Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and others
Intervenor: United States
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: State of New Hampshire, State of Utah, State of Indiana and others
Mark Nisbet, et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1707
Plaintiff - Appellant: Mark Nisbet and Sandra Nisbet
Defendant - Appellee: Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and others
Intervenor: United States
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: State of New Hampshire, State of Utah, State of Indiana and others
Rachelle Todosichuk v. Canadian Pacific Railway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1694
Plaintiff - Appellant: Rachelle Todosichuk
Defendant - Appellee: Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and others
Intervenor: United States
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: State of Nevada, State of New Hampshire, State of Utah and others
Jo Ann Flick v. Canadian Pacific Railway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1679
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jo Ann Flick
Defendant - Appellee: Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and others
Intervenor: United States
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: State of New Hampshire, State of Utah, State of Indiana and others
Leo Gleason v. Canadian Pacific Railway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1680
Plaintiff - Appellant: Leo Gleason
Defendant - Appellee: Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Limited, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and others
Intervenor: United States
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: State of New Hampshire, State of Utah, State of Iowa and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?