Cases 1 - 10 of 23
State of Utah et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Evernorth Health Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc and others
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, The and Utah Division of Consumer Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
State of Utah et al v. Haaland et al
as 4:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, Emery County and Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Department of Interior, Tracy Stone-Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of Utah et al v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, Emery County and Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Department of Interior, Tracy Stone-Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Amann v. Attorney General of the State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00753
In Re:
Wanda Amann
Plaintiff:
Paul G. Amann
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Utah, Sean Reyes, Bridget Romano and others
American Rocky Mountaineer v. Grand County State of Utah
as 4:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
American Rocky Mountaineer
Defendant:
Grand County State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. Custodian of Records for the State of Utah
as 2:2019cv00510
Respondent:
Custodian of Records for the State of Utah
Petitioner:
USA
Hackford v. State of Utah, The et al
as 2:2018cv00631
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes, Loren Anderson, G. Mark Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Douglas Hackford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of Utah v. Gollaher
as 2:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
State of Utah
Defendant:
Scott Logan Gollaher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Reyes-Soto v. State of Utah
as 2:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Reyes-Soto
Defendant:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
