Cases 1 - 9 of 9
States Resources Corp v. Howsmon Distributing Company et al
as 3:2013cv05011
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp
Defendant:
Howsmon Distributing Company, Joe Howsmon, John T. Howsmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
States Resources Corp. v. Bhakta et al
as 4:2011cv01055
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Vallabh Bhakta and Hemlata Bhakta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
States Resources Corp. v. Bhakta et al
as 3:2011cv01055
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Vallabh Bhakta and Hemlata Bhakta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
States Resources Corp. et al v. Raburn Evans Glass Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Raburn Evans Glass Service, Inc., Harold R. Evans, Debra Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
States Resources Corp. et al v. Raburn Evans Glass Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01505
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Raburn Evans Glass Service, Inc., Harold R. Evans, Debra Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
States Resources Corp. v. Silos-R-Rus, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp. and States Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Silos-R-Us, Inc., Linda Prince, Dale Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
States Resources Corp. v. Yohe et al
as 4:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Dustin Yohe, Artie Yohe and Nona Yohe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
States Resources Corp. v. Harris et al
as 3:2008cv05118
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Michael R Harris and Metz Banking Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
States Resources Corp v. Younger et al
as 5:2008cv06041
Plaintiff:
States Resources Corp
Defendant:
Mark R. Younger and Bearcat Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
