Cases 1 - 10 of 17
(PC) Cross v. State of California Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
George E. A. Cross
Defendant:
State of California Attorney General, Sacramento County D.A. Office, Orange County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) James v State of CA Attorney General et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
State of California Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Garcia v. Los Angeles County Superior Ct, et al
as 17-56877
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JOHN GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DEAN BORDERS, Warden and STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00786
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. State of California Attorney General
as 2:2015cv02519
Plaintiff:
Katrina Lee
Defendant:
State of California Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renato Obando v. Theo White, et al
as 14-55540
Petitioner - Appellant:
RENATO OBANDO
Respondent - Appellee:
THEO WHITE and STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Eric Mark Robinson v. James A Hartey
as 2:2013cv01311
Respondent:
James A Hartey and State of California Attorney General
Petitioner:
Eric Mark Robinson
Steven Lyman v. Steven Cambra, Jr., et al
as 12-56136
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN BLAIN LYMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN CAMBRA, Jr. and STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wilson v. Ola et al
as 1:2012cv00751
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Ola, Brazelton, California Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Ola et al
as 2:2012cv01105
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Ola, Brazelton, California Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
