Cases filed in Texas
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune HI-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 7:2014mc00684
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission , State of Illinois, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Fortune HI-Tech Marketing, Inc. , FHTM, Inc. , Alan Clark Holdings, Inc. and others
USA, et al v. Caremark, Inc, et al
as 5:2012cv00929
Neutral: Karl Bayer and Paul Stickney
Special Master: Karl Bayer
Intervenor Defendant: Caremark Inc. and Caremark RX, Inc.
Defendant: Caremark International Holdings, Inc., Caremark International, Inc., Caremark RX, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, Janaki Ramados, State of Delaware and others
Movant: Health Care of Delaware, Inc., HealthAssurance of Pennsylvania, McKesson Corporation and others
Notice Only Party: KPMG LLP, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Public Consulting Group, Inc. and others
919)571-4837 (fax: State of North Carolina
Intervenor Plaintiff: The State of California, United States Of America, the State of Arkansas and others
Unknown: Nicholas Bagley, Meredith Lynn Burrell and Jeanette L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
VALUEBANK, TEXAS v. UP2U, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00294
Defendant: UP2U, LLC , MO'MONEY TAX SERVICE, LLC, MONEYCO. USA, LLC and others
Plaintiff: VALUEBANK, TEXAS
Counter_claimant: UP2U, LLC
Counter_defendant: UP2U, LLC , EM-TAX SOFTWARE, INC., MO'MONEY TAX SERVICE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States Of America et al v. DeVry, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00843
Defendant: American University of the Caribbean, Chamberlain College of Nursing, DeVry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
The State of Texas et al v. Penguin Group (USA) Inc. et al Featured Case
as 1:2012cv00324
Defendant: Apple Inc., Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC, Macmillian Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, The State of Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States Of America et al v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00580
Defendant: American Express Co., American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., Class Plaintiffs in 11-md-2221 and others
Respondent: American Express Co. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: State of Arizona, State of Connecticut, State of Hawaii and others
Movant: Texas Historical Commission
Susan Ruscher et al, vs. Omnicare Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv03396
Defendant: Evergreen Pharmaceutical of California, Inc., Omnicare Distribution Center LLC, Omnicare Pharmacy of the Midwest, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Susan Ruscher, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Interested Party: Hospice of Cincinnati
Counter Claimant: Badger Acquisition of Ohio, LLC, Badger Acquisition of Tampa, LLC, CHP Acquisition Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
USA, ex rel. Steury v. State of California, et al.
as 4:2007cv01705
Plaintiff: United States of America , Leslie Steury , State of California and others
Defendant: Cardinal Health, Inc. , Cardinal Health 303, Inc and Cardinal Health Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
USA v. Abbott Laboratories et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2006cv01769
Plaintiff: USA , Kevin N Colquitt , State of Illinois and others
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories , Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
King et al vs Solvay SA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2006cv02662
Plaintiff: John King, State of Illinois, Tammy Drummond and others
Defendant: Solvay SA, Solvay America Inc, Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?