Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 53
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1031
Petitioner: State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
State of Arizona, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1159
Petitioner: State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Ohio and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Reagan, Administrator
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-7062
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party: State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee: Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Elizabeth W. Kennedy
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc., et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-5174
Defendant / Appellee: Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc., Sierra Club and Lead Agency, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and others
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1140
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner: American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor: State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee: District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae: Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1155
Petitioner: Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics, Clean Air Council and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and E. Scott Pruitt, Adminstrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Petitioner: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Intervenor For Respondent: American Chemistry Council, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Robert Cotner v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 17-7025
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Cotner
Defendant - Appellee: State of Oklahoma and Mary Fallin, Governor
State of Oklahoma, et al v. FCC, et al
as 16-1339
Petitioner: State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Joseph M. Allbaugh, Interim Director of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?