Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 311
Committee to Recall Dan Holladay, et al v. Jakob Wiley, et al
as 23-35107
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMITTEE TO RECALL DAN HOLLADAY, JEANA GONZALES and ADAM MARL
Defendant / Appellee: JAKOB WILEY, City Recorder for the City of Oregon City, in his official capacity
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF OREGON
Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems v. State of Oregon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01486
Plaintiff: Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems
Defendant: State of Oregon, Oregon Health Authority and Patrick Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court: In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court: ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16095
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16094
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16096
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
State of California et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02583
Plaintiff: State of California, State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: United States Postal Service and Louis DeJoy
Intervenor Defendant: Oshkosh Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Paul Maney, et al v. State of Oregon, et al
as 22-80033
Respondent: PAUL JULIAN MANEY, GARY CLIFT, GEORGE W. NULPH and others
Petitioner: STATE OF OREGON, KATE BROWN, COLETTE PETERS and others
D. Finicum, et al v. State of Oregon, et al
as 22-35064
Plaintiff / Appellant: D. JEANETTE FINICUM, THARA TENNEY, TIERRA COLLIER and others
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF OREGON, OREGON STATE POLICE, KATHERINE BROWN and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?