Cases 1 - 10 of 76
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Ritchie County Board of Education v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07803
Plaintiff:
Ritchie County Board of Education Ritchie County, State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harrison County Board of Education, Harrison County, State of West Virginia v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07086
Plaintiff:
Harrison County Board of Education, Harrison County, State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barbour County Schools, Barbour County, State of West Virginia v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06493
Plaintiff:
Barbour County Schools, Barbour County, State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gilmer County Board of Education, Gilmer County, State of West Virginia v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05742
Plaintiff:
Gilmer County Board of Education, Gilmer County, State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fayette County Board of Education, Fayette County, State of West Virginia v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05765
Plaintiff:
Fayette County Board of Education, Fayette County, State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Wayne County School Board, Wayne County, State of West Virginia v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04642
Plaintiff:
Wayne County School Board, Wayne County, State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nicholas County Board of Education, Nicholas County, State of West Virginia v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04631
Plaintiff:
Nicholas County Board of Education, Nicholas County, State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
