Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Michael Serrato v. Steve Cooley
as 10-56912
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO SERRATO
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE COOLEY, County District Attorney
George Owens v. California Department of Mental Health
as 2:2010cv09399
Respondent:
Chief Deputy Warden G. E. Brochy and District Attorney Steve Cooley
Petitioner:
George E. Owens
Michael Serrato v. County District Attorney, et al
as 10-56903
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO SERRATO
Respondent - Appellee:
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and STEVE COOLEY
Eric Darnell Cook v. Robert A Rabbani et al
as 2:2010cv08562
Plaintiff:
Eric Darnell Cook
Defendant:
Steve Cooley, Steve Cooley, Department of Corrections and others
Ronnie Lee v. Steve Cooley, et al
as 10-56750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE COOLEY, Los Angeles District Attorney, CRAIG GOLD, Deputy District Attorney and RALPH PERETZ, Priv. Attorney
Michael Angelo Serrato v. Steve Cooley
as 2:2010cv06297
Respondent:
Steve Cooley
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Serrato
Rickey Louis Alford v. Superior Court Judges, Lancaster Division et al
as 2:2010cv05168
Plaintiff:
Rickey Louis Alford
Defendant:
Steve Cooley, County of Los Angeles, Steven Crosby and others
Michael Angelo Serrato v. County District Attorney et al
as 2:2010cv05052
Respondent:
Steve Cooley and County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Serrato
Anthony DeVaughn v. Steve Cooley
as 10-55820
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY M. DEVAUGHN
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE COOLEY, Steve Cooley
Kevin Bryant v. California Superior Court, et al
as 09-56530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN DARNELL BRYANT
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, in its individual and official capacities, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, in its individual and official capacities, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a Dummy Corporation, in its individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
