Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Keith Blackwell v. Dhaliwal Jaspal, et al
as 20-55198
Defendant / Appellee:
M. LIN, Clinical Director, RUDY LEYVES, DHALIWAL JASPAL, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Y. CARLON, STEVE LANGFORD, JACK FOX and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Phillip Camillo-Amisano v. BOP, et al
as 20-55038
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, FCC Lompoc, ALVAREZ, Lieutenant, individual, WILLIAM WATSON, M.D., individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP CAMILLO-AMISANO
Angel Rivera v. Steve Langford
as 19-55445
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGEL RIVERA
Oliver Boling v. Steve Langford
as 19-55126
Petitioner / Appellant:
OLIVER BOLING
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD
Rodney Browning v. USDC-CALA
as 18-71747
:
In re: RODNEY BROWNING
Petitioner:
RODNEY BROWNING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
STEVE LANGFORD
Emiel Kandi v. Steve Langford, et al
as 18-55201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMIEL A. KANDI
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, Lompoc FCI, liable individually, in their official capacities, RAY GARCIA, Associate Warden, Lompoc, FCI, liable individually, in their official capacities, JOHN BRANNAN, Lompoc Mailroom Complex Supervisor, liable individually, in their official capacities and others
Martin Vandemerwe v. Steve Langford
as 18-55019
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN R. VANDEMERWE
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD
Emiel Kandi v. Steve Langford
as 17-56909
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMIEL A. KANDI
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD
Phillip Martinez v. Steve Langford, et al
as 17-56818
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD and CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Harry Miles v. Steve Langford
as 17-56714
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY EDWIN MILES
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
