Cases
Forte v. McNellis
as 23-7716
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL FORTE
Defendant / Appellee: Detective BRIAN MCNELLIS, Shield #5286, Detective EDWARD GARRITY, Shield #7920, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Poletti v. Pepsi?Cola Bottling Company Of New York, Inc.
as 23-7337
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGEL LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, TERENCE J. POLETTI, LEONARD COSTA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: WALTER SCHMITT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and DONNA MAGNUSSEN, as the Executor of the Estate of Richard Magnussen
Defendant / Appellee: PEPSICOLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., REGINALD GOINS, WILLIAM W. WILSON and others
Nieves v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv01697
Plaintiff: Steven Nieves
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Poletti et al v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company Of New York, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv07603
Plaintiff: Terence J. Poletti, Leonard Costa, Christopher J. Chapman and others
Defendant: Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company Of New York, Inc., Reginald Goins, William W. Wilson and others
Michel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11311
Plaintiff: Luigi Nasti, Lenora Moody, Richard Mirabell and others
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Gary Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Nieves v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00416
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Steven Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?