Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Sullivan v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-940
Plaintiff:
KEITH WILLIAM SULLIVAN
Defendant:
STEVEN SISOLAK, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Sullivan v. Sisolak
as 2:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Keith Sullivan
Defendant:
Steven Sisolak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Keith William Sullivan
Defendant:
Steven Sisolak, Joseph Lombardo, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 23-15466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ammar Harris v. F. Dreesen, et al
as 23-15467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
F. DREESEN, MORIN, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cirello v. Riedel et al
as 2:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
Robert Guy Cirello
Defendant:
Matthew Scott Riedel, Jacqueline Gravatt, NLVPO2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Johnson v. NDOC et al
as 3:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Defendant:
NDOC, Steven Sisolak, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
F. Dreesen, Morin, Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Sisolak et al
as 2:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
Steven Sisolak, Barbara Cegavske, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
