Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STEVENSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv00972
Plaintiff:
TREY OSHAE STEVENSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHAL, UNKNOWN MPD EMPLOYEES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BREWER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00565
Plaintiff:
JAMES BREWER , MARQUETTE FRAZIER and ARIK SIMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , WILLIAM SMITH, JONATHAN ARMSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
KINGSTON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00528
Plaintiff:
ROALSTON-STEVENSON KINGSTON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DIRECTOR OF OFFICE OF ALIEN PROPERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KINGSTON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01861
Plaintiff:
ROALSTON STEVENSON KINGSTON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JEH CHARLES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-7049
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
AGEE et al v. SCHAFER
as 1:2008cv00882
Plaintiff:
MARY LEE AGEE, RONNIE ALDRIDGE, VERLENE ALSTON and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
