Cases
GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv05218
Petitioner: GEORGE MEEHAN, Stichting Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek, Stichting Pensioenfonds van de Metalektro and others
Plaintiff: GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT
Defendant: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., HANS VESTBERG and MATTHEW ELLIS
Sjunde Ap-Fonden and The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. General Electric Company, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv08457
Defendant: Jeffrey R. Immelt, General Electric Company, John Flannery and others
Plaintiff: Jihad A. Hachem, International Fund Management S.A., Deka International S.A. and others
Petitioner: Richard D. Haynie, New York City Police Pension Fund, New York City Fire Pension Fund and others
Interested Party: Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP
Consolidated Plaintiff: Gopal Mirani
Intervenor Plaintiff: The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stichting Pensioenfonds Metaal En Techniek et al v. BP PLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00069
Defendant: BP PLC , BP America Inc. , BP Exploration & Production Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Stichting Pensioenfonds Metaal En Techniek , Stichting Pensioenfonds van de Metalelektro , Stichting Aandelenfonds Mn Services Europa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jimmy Karam, et al v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc., et al
as 12-56723
Plaintiff: JIMMY ELIAS KARAM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff - Appellant: STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS METAAL EN TECHNIEK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and WYOMING RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC., JACK D. MASSIMINO, PETER C. WALLER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?