Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States for the Use and Benefit of Stock Building Supply West, LLC v. Allied Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03211
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of Stock Building Supply West, LLC
Defendant:
Allied Industries, Inc. , American Safety Casualty Insurance Company , S & W Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stock Building Supply West, Inc. v. J A Hill Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv02724
Plaintiff:
Stock Building Supply West, Inc.
Defendant:
J A Hill Corporation, LB/L-Villa Hilltop LLC, IndyMac Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Esprit One, LLC v. Stock Building Supply West, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Esprit One, LLC and Esprit One, LLC
Defendant:
Stock Building Supply West, Inc., Stock Building Supply West, Inc. and DOES
ThirdParty Defendant:
MTH Construction, Inc, Sondermann Enterprises, Inc. and Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Stock Building Supply West, Inc. v. D.N.M. Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00648
Plaintiff:
Stock Building Supply West, Inc. and Stock Building Supply West, Inc.
Defendant:
D.N.M. Construction Co., Inc., Andrew John Railla and Esprit One LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
