Cases 1 - 10 of 27
KING STREET TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
KING STREET TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ZANZARELLA v. USA
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ZANZARELLA, 334 FISHKILL AVE. LLC, 544 MAIN STREET LLC and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Wazee Street Opportunities Fund IV LP v. US
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
WAZEE STREET OPPORTUNITIES FUND IV LP, DOUGLAS WHITLEY, LISA A. BROWN, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Burger v. US
as 24-1249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BASIL AGAPION, SOPHIA S. AGAPION, KATHE BURGER and others
Plaintiff:
GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Chapman Spring/Garden, LLC v. US
as 24-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAPMAN SPRING/GARDEN, LLC, CHANEY-FRYE #4, LLC, D.S. CHANEY PROPERTIES #6, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
112 GENESEE STREET, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01876
Plaintiff:
112 GENESEE STREET, LLC, 1233 POLK STREET, LLC, 1490 RESTAURANT, INC. and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Street Spirit IP LLC v. eHarmony, Inc.
as 23-2441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STREET SPIRIT IP LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
EHARMONY, INC.
233RD STREET PARTNERSHIP, L.P. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
233RD STREET PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
100 M. STREET LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
100 M. STREET LLC., JAMES A. BECKER, PATRICIA L. CAMBIANICA and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
102 BENSON STREET LAND TRUST et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
102 BENSON STREET LAND TRUST, 112 BENSON STREET LAND TRUST, 95/96 BENSON STREET LAND TRUST and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
