Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Evergreen Media Holdings, LLC et al v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP et al
as 2:2015cv01648
Plaintiff:
Tony Derosa-Grund and Evergreen Media Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Does, John M. Gatti, David McGriff and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03497
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03502
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03500
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03499
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P. v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2010cv03801
Plaintiff:
CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 3 to 4 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arcari v. 46th Street Development LLC et al
as 1:2010cv03619
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Arcari
Defendant:
46th Street Development LLC , Allen F. Goldman , Steven J. Pozycki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kiner et al v. 46th Street Development, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv02840
Plaintiff:
Arkady Kiner, Emil Kiner and Marina Kiner
Defendant:
46th Street Development, LLC and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Clumm v. Manes et al
as 2:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
William A. Clumm
Defendant:
Janna Manes, Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, LLP and Andrea Francine
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP v. Intelligent Card Services Inc et al
as 2:2007cv03256
Plaintiff:
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
Defendant:
Intelligent Card Services Inc, Robert Dorf and Robert Dorf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
