Cases 1 - 10 of 36
FARRELL et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FARRELL, BRENDA HYPES, DEREK SULLIVAN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BAUER et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. BAUER, LAURA S. BAUER, RICHARD KENT COMPTON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Sullivan v. OPM
as 24-1096
Petitioner:
NANCY SULLIVAN, Executor of the Estate of John V. Sullivan
Respondent:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
SULLIVAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01579
Petitioner:
SCOTT SULLIVAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
EVANS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
BETSY B. EVANS, DONALD R. EVANS, JR., ARDEN W. THORNTON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023vv00670
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SULLIVAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00458
Petitioner:
KIMBERLY SULLIVAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SULLIVAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01374
Petitioner:
LISA SULLIVAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SULLIVAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00091
Petitioner:
REBECCA SULLIVAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
In re: Zhu
as 21-1761
Appellant:
GARY J. SULLIVAN, YONGJUN WU and In re: LIHUA ZHU
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
