Cases 51 - 60 of 61
ZIMMERMAN v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
JODY A. ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
REEDER v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2011cv01362
Plaintiff:
JOEL A. REEDER
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - ERISA
ROSE v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2011cv01182
Plaintiff:
WILMA ROSE
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lane v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
as 3:2010cv02230
Plaintiff:
Patricia E. Lane
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and Sun Life Financial
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
UMILE v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2010cv04023
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. UMILE
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEPTUNE v. SUN LIFE FINANCIAL et al
as 5:2010cv02938
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. NEPTUNE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Tosten v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 1:2009cv01890
Plaintiff:
Suzette Tosten and Suzette Tosten
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
YAICH v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 5:2008cv05791
Plaintiff:
PENNY YAICH
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA ( U.S. ) v. BONACE et al
as 1:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA ( U.S. )
Defendant:
DENNIS L. BONACE and CHARLES MARTIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
AWAD v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 5:2008cv02977
Plaintiff:
MAHMOOD AWAD
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
