Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Ohr v. MTIL, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02656
Plaintiff:
Peter Sung Ohr
Respondent:
MTIL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
You et al v. Wild Symphony, LLC. et al
as 1:2016cv10293
Plaintiff:
Kwan Og You , Sung Joon Ahn and Young Hee Yang
Defendant:
Wild Symphony, LLC , Byung J Sung and Francisca J Jung
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ohr v. EFN OBT1 LLC et al
as 1:2016cv09018
Plaintiff:
Peter Sung Ohr
Defendant:
EFN OBT1 LLC , North American Automotive Services, Inc. and Nai Hiffman Asset Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
BBCN Bank v. Chicago Title Land Trust Company et al
as 1:2015cv10913
Plaintiff:
BBCN Bank
Defendant:
Chicago Title Land Trust Company, Woo Rham Chae, Christina Chae and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peter Sung Ohr v. Arlington Metals Corporation
as 1:2015cv08885
Petitioner:
Peter Sung Ohr
Respondent:
Arlington Metals Corporation
Movant:
United Steel, Paper And Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial And Service Workers International Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Knaus et al v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2014cv00839
Defendant:
Boeing Company, The
Plaintiff:
Carl Knaus , Maricel Anino Knaus , Nini Shao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Ohr v. Latino Express, Inc.
as 1:2013cv09123
Plaintiff:
Peter Sung Ohr
Defendant:
Latino Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Ohr v. Napleton Arlington Heights Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram
as 1:2013cv07684
Defendant:
Napleton Arlington Heights Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram
Plaintiff:
Peter Sung Ohr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Maum Meditation House of Truth et al v. Lake County
as 1:2013cv03794
Plaintiff:
Maum Meditation House of Truth and Sheeyung Sung
Defendant:
Lake County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Sung Ohr, v. Nexeo Solutions, LLC
as 1:2012cv01226
Respondent:
Nexeo Solutions, LLC
Petitioner:
Peter Sung Ohr
Amicu:
Teamsters Local Union 705
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
