Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Pak v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00513
Defendant:
John Does, Immigration Officer Serving Order, Deportation Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Sung Pak
A Very Short White Male ICE Officer With A Polish Sounding Name Who Was Assigned To Plaintiff While:
Polish-sounding ICE Officer
As It Appears In Handwriting:
Deportation Officer R. Zamar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cho et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv07961
Plaintiff:
Sung Cho , Nagle Washrite LLC , David Diaz and others
Defendant:
City Of New York , Bill de Blasio , New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yoon et al v. Joo et al
as 1:2014cv05329
Defendant:
Ho Seop Choe, Sung Soo Han and Young Kwang Joo
Plaintiff:
Ung Chan Kim, Yae Han Kim and Hwa Joong Yoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Chepilko v. Bushuyev et al
as 1:2014cv06732
Plaintiff:
Sergei Chepilko
Defendant:
Yevgeniy Bushuyev, James Farah, David Lamarre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
