Cases 21 - 30 of 886
Liggins v. Capra
as 24-801
Petitioner:
JEFFREY LIGGINS
Respondent:
MICHAEL CAPRA, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Richard v. Fischer
as 24-793
Defendant:
Ms. DIGNEAN, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, THOMAS TANEA, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of DOCCS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIS RICHARD
Animal Welfare Institute v. Romero
as 24-776
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE and WILDLIFE PRESERVES, INC.
Defendant:
ALEXCY ROMERO, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Fire Island National Seashore, The UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burrell v. Mason
as 24-737
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BRYAN D. MASON, Sergeant; Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. GORDON, Clinton Correctional Facility, C.O. DEYO, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Johnson v. Samuelson
as 24-739
Petitioner:
JINJA J. KYNG PARIAH JOHNSON
Respondent:
Superintendent SAMUELSON
Tripathy v. Schneider
as 24-560
Plaintiff:
SANJAY TRIPATHY
Defendant:
ANDREA N. SCHNEIDER, Acting Superintendent Gowanda CF, D. LOCKWOOD, Acting Deputy Superintendent of Security, Gowanda CF, M.D. JOHN MORLEY, Deputy Commissioner & Chief Medical Officer, DOCCS, Albany, NY and others
Sloley v. NYS DOCCS
as 24-662
Plaintiff:
MAXMILLIAN SLOLEY and BX
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Correction Officer JOYCE, P.A. MILOV and others
James v. State of New York
as 24-624
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. JAMES
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK and DONITA E. MCINTOSH, FORMER CLINTON DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF PROGRAM
Scharkey v. Bennett
as 24-600
Petitioner:
JAMES SCHARKEY
Respondent:
S. BENNETT, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
