Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Williams v. Poole
as 17-1151
Petitioner:
Mario Williams
Respondent:
Thomas Poole, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
Outman v. Superintendent
as 17-299
Petitioner - Appellant:
Alan M. Outman
Respondent - Appellee:
Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
Mills v. Lempke
as 16-3730
Petitioner - Appellant:
Richard Mills
Respondent:
Eric T. Schneiderman
Respondent - Appellee:
John B. Lempke
Defendant:
Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility and State of New York
Gizewski v. New York State Department of C
as 16-2931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Gizewski
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Michael Sheahan, Superintendent; Five Points Correctional Facility; sued in his official and individual capacity, John Doe, 1, Treating Physician; Five Points Correctional Facility; sued in official and individual capacity and others
Corporan v. Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
as 1:2015cv06835
Petitioner:
Richard Corporan
Respondent:
Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chrysler v. Guiney
as 14-1485
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gregory Chrysler
Respondent - Appellee:
G. Guiney, Acting Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility
Davis v. Sheahan
as 14-1186
Petitioner - Appellant:
Ahmeek Davis, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Michael Sheahan, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
Saracina v. Sheahan
as 13-3906
Petitioner:
Scott A. Saracina
Respondent:
Michael Sheahan, Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility
Scott v. Sheahan
as 13-3747
Petitioner:
Scott Lawrence
Respondent:
Michael Sheahan, Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
Williams v. Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2013cv00839
Plaintiff:
Riley Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility, Gates and Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
