Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Olivo v. Graham
as 21-2065
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carlos Perez Olivo
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent H. Graham, Auburn Correctional Facility; New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Geron v. Graham
as 1:2017cv07380
Petitioner:
Roberto Geron
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Graham
as 1:2017cv03395
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner:
Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tavarez v. Graham
as 1:2017cv01318
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner:
Edward Tavarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. Graham
as 1:2016cv05856
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner:
Juan Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2015cv06205
Defendant:
Superintendent H. Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson, New York Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Graham
as 1:2015cv05461
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner:
Luis Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kearney v. Graham
as 1:2015cv04829
Respondent:
Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner:
Richard Kearney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony v. Graham et al
as 1:2015cv01247
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony
Respondent:
Richard A. Brown, Superintendent H. Graham and Ronald Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2015mc00258
Defendant:
1-10 Correction Officer, Superintendent H. Graham, District Attorney Robert Thomas Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
