Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Godfrey v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv02832
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, Tom Dart, Superintendent Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Godfrey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Medical Director CCDOC et al
as 1:2021cv01723
Defendant:
Medical Director CCDOC, Tom Dart, Superintendant Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv06653
Defendant:
DaBrownski, Superintendent Walsh, Tom Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Darius Drew Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv04965
Defendant:
Sergeant Campos, Cermak Directors, Officers Jane, & John Doe's 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilkins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massenberg v. Division 6 Medical Staff et al
as 1:2020cv03580
Plaintiff:
Marcus Massenberg
Defendant:
Division 6 Medical Staff, McColough, Pharmacist who tendered expired Medication and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Walsh et al
as 1:2020cv02239
Defendant:
Jasmin J.P., Tom Dart and Superintendant Walsh
Plaintiff:
Brian Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv07130
Defendant:
Barbara Davis, Anna Jiminez, Cermak Health Services of Cook County and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv07128
Defendant:
Barbara Davis, Anne Jimenez, Superintendent Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. McCoy et al
as 1:2019cv06887
Plaintiff:
David Martinez, Joe Garcia and Brandon Wilson
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C., Superintendent Walsh, Ms. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv06738
Defendant:
Dr. Davis, Tom Dart, Superintendant Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Smith and Vincent M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
