Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Saso v. Mayor et al
as 3:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Chandler E. Saso
Defendant:
Mayor, Police Chief, Detectives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mayor et al
as 3:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Anderson
Defendant:
Mayor, Police Chief, Detectives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belk et al v. Mayor et al
as 3:2021cv01253
Plaintiff:
Cameron Belk, Sr., Derek Burton, Michael M. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Mayor, Police Chief, Detectives and others
Interested Party:
Dion Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00989
Defendant:
Medical Director Doe, Warden Doe and Dietary Supervisor Doe
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. Keefer et al
as 3:2020cv00856
Defendant:
C/O Keefer, Internal Affairs Borwin, Supervisor Allsup and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blue v. St. Clair County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Aramark Kitchen Supervisors, St. Clair County Jail, Maintenance Jail Crew and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Blue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Egner v. Dennison et al
as 3:2019cv01213
Defendant:
Bettis, Kyle Bernard, Jeffrey Dennison and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Egner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv01374
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Moore
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, Prison Review Board, Pinckneyville C.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv01030
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Bond County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Allen
Defendant:
Bond County Jail, Jeff Brown and Bond County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
