Cases 1 - 10 of 1,627
EILERS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05678
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
SUSAN EILERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHAFER et al v. WITHERELL et al
as 1:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
TRICIA SCHAFER and UNCLE MOUSE LLC
Defendant:
ALYCE M BUSCH, ALEXANDRE MOTZER, PEACOCK KELLER LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
BARILL v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05277
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
SUSAN BARILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
George v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
Susan George
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PARKS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv05204
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
SUSAN PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Woloski v. NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04682
Plaintiff:
Susan Woloski
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.