Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Newbery v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06403
Plaintiff:
Jorge Newbery and Susana A. Mendoza
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown v. Chicago State University et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Gloria Brown
Defendant:
Chicago State University and Susana A. Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2019cv03494
Defendant:
Deborah Hagan, Jesse White, State Of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alma Cortez-Mendoza v. William Barr
as 19-70051
Petitioner:
ALMA SUSANA CORTEZ-MENDOZA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Alma Cortez-Mendoza v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72056
Petitioner:
ALMA SUSANA CORTEZ-MENDOZA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Compton v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2017cv07575
Plaintiff:
Nancy A. Compton
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, Dupage County Health Department, Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Blocker v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Aaron Blocker
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Garry McCarthy, Scott M Digrazia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Reiter et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
John C. Justice
Defendant:
Greg Reiter, Fair Deal of Illinois, Inc., Any Other Buyers of Tax Liens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alma Cortez-Mendoza v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73556
Petitioner:
ALMA SUSANA CORTEZ-MENDOZA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Park Pet Shop, Inc. et al v. City of Chicago
as 1:2015cv01450
Plaintiff:
Park Pet Shop, Inc. , Pocket Puppies Boutique, Inc. , Cedar Woods Farm and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Susana A. Mendoza and Sandra Alfred
Amicu:
The Humane Society of the United States and The Puppy Mill Project
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
