Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Dustin Young v. John Swaney, et al
as 24-3394
Petitioner:
DUSTIN YOUNG
Respondent:
JOHN R. SWANEY, Madison County Sheriff and BUTLER COUNTY, OH COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Lora v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Jose Lora
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dupont v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Omega Demetrius Dupont
Respondent:
G Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mack v. Swaney et al
as 2:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Terrell Mack
Respondent:
Warden Swaney and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Collins v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Randy H. Collins, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vasquez v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Fabio Ochoa Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yagop et al v. Bam Bar LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Silvee Yagop, Maura Lund, Danielle Shoup and others
Defendant:
Bam Bar LLC, Bam Bar WC LLC, Bae Bar LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Haapaniemi v. Swaney et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Respondent:
Warden Swaney, Heribierto Tellez and US Atty Morgan Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anthony Stokes v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5034
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DARNELL STOKES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, GARY SWANEY, Warden, FCI Manchester and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Travis v. Swaney et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Johnathan Travis
Respondent:
Warden Swaney and Director Tellez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
