Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Swinson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv10085
Defendant:
Warden Sheraj, City of New York, Hazel Jennings and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Swinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinson v. Vance et al
as 1:2020cv03091
Respondent:
Cy Vance, Cynthia Brann and Joseph Fucito
Petitioner:
Randy Swinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swinson v. Suares
as 1:2020cv02696
Petitioner:
Randy Swinson
Respondent:
Warden Suares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swinson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv02694
Plaintiff:
Randy E. Swinson
Defendant:
John Doe, Warden, MDC, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv01788
Defendant:
Warden Swarurez, C.O. Masoni, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Swinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv01684
Defendant:
Police Officer Vincent Candela, Police Officer Robert Humann, Police Officer Michael Farewell and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Swinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv00994
Defendant:
Warden Swarurez, Security CO Martinez, C.O. Masoni and others
Plaintiff:
Randy E. Swinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swinson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv11919
Defendant:
Hester Moulton, Teresa Cuadra, Ira Gornish and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Swinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAZ Trading L.L.C. et al v. Hunts Point Co-Operative Board et al
as 1:2015cv10091
Plaintiff:
RAZ Trading L.L.C., Associates LLP and Kevin Razzoli
Defendant:
Hunts Point Co-Operative Board, Hunts Point Board Members, Alphas Company of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Swinson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03607
Plaintiff:
Randy Swinson
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe, Robert W. Harold, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
