Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Michael Washington v. , et alIn re: Michael Washington v. , et al
as 23-2269
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL T. WASHINGTON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE, WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and COLM F. CONNOLLY
James RileyIn re: James Riley
as 22-2520
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES W. RILEY, DEDRP
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
In re: Bernard D. Ellerbe
as 22-1070
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD D. ELLERBE
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and COLM F. CONNOLLY
Howard Woodlin v. Warden James T Vaughn Corr., et al
as 21-3188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD E. WOODLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Anel Hubbard v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 21-3011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANEL HUBBARD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Luis Reyes v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 21-2863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUIS E. REYES
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Charles Scott v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 21-2864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Duane Rollins v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 21-2739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUANE ROLLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
James RileyIn re: James Riley
as 21-2126
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES W. RILEY, DEDRP
Julian Bodnari v. Warden James T Vaughn CC, et al
as 21-2116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIAN BODNARI
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
