Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Joseph v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Josue Joseph
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Phillips et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80700
Plaintiff:
Elroy Phillips and Sixtoria Phillips
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Saleh v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Saleh
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Rose v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Interested Party:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00008
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Panchal et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pina Panchal and South Tampa Cardiology, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
