Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05076
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AQUA PENNSYLVANIA, INC. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2014cv04742
Plaintiff: AQUA PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Defendant: T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06583
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
CASAGRANDE et al v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00769
Plaintiff: DANIELLE CASAGRANDE , JOHN S. CASAGRANDE and ALEXANDRIA ELIZABETH PIAZZA
Defendant: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. , MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC , DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK v. THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06259
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK
Defendant: THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK , TD BANK, N.A. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FAIR v. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05492
Plaintiff: THERESA FAIR
Defendant: SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BORSCHELL v. EOS CCA et al
as 2:2010cv04085
Plaintiff: ANDREW BORSCHELL
Defendant: EOS CCA and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOHAMMED et al v. BAIRD et al
as 2:2009cv03232
Plaintiff: DAUDA SALIFU MOHAMMED and RAIHANA MOHAMMED
Defendant: ROBERT G. BAIRD, JR. and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury None
DUNCAN v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 5:2009cv00736
Plaintiff: TONY DUNCAN, JR.
Defendant: T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?