Cases 71 - 80 of 84
Allen v. T.D.C.J. Director
as 3:2010cv00205
Petitioner:
Tarron Allen
Respondent:
T.D.C.J. Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Siegel v. T.D.C.J. Director
as 4:2010cv00754
Petitioner:
Nathan Dustin Heath Siegel
Respondent:
T.D.C.J. Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Siegel v. T.D.C.J. Director
as 1:2010cv00080
Petitioner:
Nathan Dustin Heath Siegel
Respondent:
T.D.C.J. Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kincaid v. T.D.C.J. et al
as 1:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Kincaid
Defendant:
T.D.C.J., Mrs. Moya and John Middleton Unit Dentist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haskell v. Cook et al
as 4:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Haskell
Defendant:
Keith Cook, Hughes, Amanada Baily and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flanagan v. Director of T.D.C.J.
as 1:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Ray Flanagan
Defendant:
Director of T.D.C.J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooden v. Abbott et al
as 4:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
Trayson Lashone Wooden
Defendant:
Gregg Abbott, City of Fort Worth, Office of City Secretary, Charles Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valdez v. T.D.C.J. Bradshaw Unit et al
as 3:2009cv00282
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hugo Valdez
Defendant:
T.D.C.J. Bradshaw Unit, The Government Center, Dallas County Jail, Frank Crowley Courts Building and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Honorable Judge Wisser et al
as 1:2008cv00577
Petitioner:
Marcus Taylor
Respondent:
Honorable Judge Wisser, Ronald Earle, Charles J. Sau and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Powell v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2008cv00182
Plaintiff:
Dennis Powell
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Commonwealth of T.D.C.J.-I.D. and Commonwealth of U.T.M.B. Corr. Managed Health Care
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
