Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Kensu v. Nessel
as 2:2022cv11834
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Defendant: Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 22-1493
Plaintiff / Appellant: TEMUJIN KENSU
Defendant / Appellee: CORIZON, INC. and QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE OF MICHIGAN, P.C.
Temujin Kensu v. MDOC, et al
as 21-1802
Plaintiff / Appellant: TEMUJIN KENSU
Defendant / Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, DAN HEYNS and others
Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1083
Defendant / Appellee: RICKEY J. COLEMAN, GINA COUTURIER, HOWARD TYREE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TEMUJIN KENSU
Temujin KensuIn re: Temujin Kensu
as 20-105
Respondent: PATRICIA CARUSO, DOES 1-200, (MDOC Food Service Managers), DAN HEYNS and others
Petitioner: In re: TEMUJIN KENSU
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10944
Defendant: Quality Correctional Care of Michigan, P.C. and Corizon, Inc.
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kensu v. Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, d/b/a Access Corrections
as 2:2019cv10651
Defendant: Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, d/b/a Access Corrections
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
v. Kensu et al
as 2:2019cv10650
Defendant: Temujin Kensu and Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, d/b/a Access Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10616
Defendant: Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10615
Defendant: Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff: Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?