Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Archer Daniels-Midland Company v. APAC-Tennessee, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00338
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
APAC-Tennessee, Inc., Lafarge North America Inc. and Knight Towing, LLC
Cross_claimant:
Lafarge North America Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Knight Towing, LLC and APAC-Tennessee, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Lafarge North America Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Tennessee Farmers Cooperative et al v. Murphy Global et al
as 1:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Farmers Cooperative
Defendant:
Murphy Global , Murphy Farms , J Murphy Farms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AEP River Operations LLC v. Tennessee Materials Corporation
as 4:2011cv01541
Plaintiff:
AEP River Operations LLC
Defendant:
Tennessee Materials Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee as Plan Administrator and Fiduciary of National Health Corporation Health Benefit Plan v. Harper, Evans, Wade & Netemeyer et al
as 2:2011cv04193
Plaintiff:
Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee as Plan Administrator and Fiduciary of National Health Corporation Health Benefit Plan
Defendant:
Harper, Evans, Wade & Netemeyer and Keri Ann Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Austin Hardware and Supply, Inc. v. SFI of Tennessee, LLC
as 4:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
Austin Hardware and Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
SFI of Tennessee, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montgomery Bank, N.A. v. First Horizon Home loan Corporation
as 1:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
First Horizon Home Loan Corporation , First Tennessee Bank, N.A. , First Tennessee Bank Naitonal Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Express Scripts, Inc. v. Maury County, Tennessee
as 4:2009cv00585
Plaintiff:
Express Scripts, Inc.
Defendant:
Maury County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
