Cases 91 - 100 of 468
Peters v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2021cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
State Of Texas and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00011
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Cherry v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
as 4:2020cv04407
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
William Cherry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman vs. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 4:2020cv04406
Defendant:
Gary Deshone Freeman and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yancy v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2020cv04158
Plaintiff:
Carl Edmond Yancy
Defendant:
TDCJ Office Adjura, The State Of Texas and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towery v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv04088
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Petitioner:
Doshee Swan Towery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whitehead v. Curbo et al
as 4:2020cv03869
Defendant:
Melody Curbo, LVN, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and Latina Blair, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Derek Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2020cv03581
Defendant:
Rabbi Dovid Goldstein, The Chabad Outreach, The State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Hearn et al
as 4:2020cv03684
Plaintiff:
Billy Richards and Billy Holmes
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Charles J. Hearn and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
