Cases 51 - 60 of 9,219
Smith v. FCI Texarkana Warden
as 24-40142
Petitioner:
Curtis Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and FCI Texarkana Warden
Schorsch v. Kwarteng
as 24-40133
Plaintiff:
James Schorsch
Defendant:
Isaac Kwarteng and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Hammond v. Lumpkin
as 24-10181
Petitioner:
James Bradley Hammond
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Gibson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10184
Petitioner:
Scottie H. Gibson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, r, State of Texas 413th Judicial District of Johnson County, State of Texas 249th Judicial District Court of Johnson County and others
Gryder v. TDCJ-CID
as 24-40130
Plaintiff:
James Gryder
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID and Donald Muniz, Warden, Eastham Unit - Texas Department of Criminal Justice; Correctional Institutional Division
Roy v. Lumpkin
as 24-40116
Petitioner:
Alex Joseph Roy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thompson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20078
Petitioner:
Overille Denton Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 24-20080
Petitioner:
Darrel Wayne Brown
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
White v. Lumpkin
as 24-40119
Petitioner:
William Dexter White
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Albarado v. Lumpkin
as 24-10163
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
