Cases 1 - 10 of 1,830
Board of Trustees of Western States Insulators and Allied Individual Account Plan et al v. Texas State Insulation, Inc.
as 4:2024cv03586
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Western States Insulators and Allied Individual Account Plan, Board of Trustees of Western States Insulators and Allied Workers Health Plan, Board of Trustees, Western States Insulators and Allied Workers Pension Plan and others
Defendant:
Texas State Insulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Alameda County Electrical Industry Service Corporation, a California corporation et al v. Eclipse Electric of California et al
as 3:2024cv03528
Plaintiff:
Alameda County Electrical Industry Service Corporation, IBEW Local 595 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, IBEW Local 595 Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Eclipse Electric of California doing business as Eclipse Electric of Oakland and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Chavez v. East Bay Drayage Drivers Security Fund Plan et al
as 3:2024cv03487
Plaintiff:
Leah Chavez
Defendant:
East Bay Drayage Drivers Security Fund Plan, East Bay Drayage Drivers Security Fund Plan Board of Trustees, Corcoran Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Mercoza
as 3:2024cv03427
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Pension Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Defendant:
Mercoza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Writers Guild-Industry Health Fund et al v. Corporate Management Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04747
Plaintiff:
Writers Guild-Industry Health Fund and Board of Trustees of the Writers Guild-Industry Health Fund
Defendant:
Corporate Management Solutions, Inc., 29 Ninjas, LLC, dba 30 Ninjas, Julina Tatlock and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pohl v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 16 Pension Plan et al
as 4:2024cv02120
Plaintiff:
James Pohl
Defendant:
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 16 Pension Plan, Board of Trustees of the I.A.T.S.E. Local 16 Pension Plan Trust Fund, BeneSys Administrators of I.A.T.S.E. Local 16 Pension Trust Funds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
The Board of Trustees of the Western States Insulators and Allied Workers Pension Plan et al v. A1 Insulation Mechanical LLCliability company
as 2:2024cv04337
Plaintiff:
The Board of Trustees of the Western States Insulators and Allied Workers Pension Plan, The Board of Trustees of the Western States Insulators and Allied Workers Health Plan, The Board of Trustees of the Western States Insulators and Allied Workers Individual Account Plan and others
Defendant:
A1 Insulation Mechanical LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. Debra Reid et al
as 2:2024cv03342
Defendant:
Debra Jo Reid individually also known as Deb Reid doing business as Golden State Specialties, a sole ownership, Deb Reid and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation and Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
