Cases 41 - 50 of 165
ROKITA v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv05183
Petitioner:
MARK C. ROKITA and MARK C. ROKITA, JR.
Respondent:
MR. BARRY SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALTERS v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2018cv03722
Petitioner:
BRIAN WALTERS
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DADE v. COPOZZA et al
as 2:2018cv03411
Petitioner:
LEROY DADE
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTEND MARK COPOZZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MYERS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2018cv03038
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LAUREL HARRY and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Petitioner:
KARL MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBERTS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv02562
Petitioner:
CALVIN ROBERTS
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIPANFILO, JR. v. SUPERINTENDENT MOONEY et al
as 2:2018cv01690
Petitioner:
JUSTIN JOHN DIPANFILO, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TILLMAN V. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2018cv01030
Petitioner:
EDWARD TILLMAN
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2018cv00963
Petitioner:
ANDRE MICHAEL JONES
Respondent:
TAMMY L. FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAWES v. MAHALLEY et al
as 2:2017cv05316
Petitioner:
MARWAN HAWES
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DURHAM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05152
Plaintiff:
TAJAN DURHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COUNTY OF BUCKS, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.