Cases
ADAMS v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2014cv02200
Petitioner: CORDELL ADAMS
Respondent: LAWRENCE MAHALLY , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLAY v. SAUERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05670
Petitioner: GARY CLAY
Respondent: DEBRA SAUERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BICKLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv07124
Petitioner: WILLIAM C. WILLIAMS
Respondent: TABB BICKLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BILAL v. WALSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01973
Petitioner: NAFIS BILAL
Respondent: JERRY WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEONHAUSER v. PALAKOVICH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01175
Petitioner: WILLIAM M. LEONHAUSER
Respondent: JOHN A. PALAKOVICH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOULTRIE v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv04718
Petitioner: FREDDIE M. MOULTRIE
Respondent: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?