Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Drammeh v. Marshalls of MA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Musu K. Drammeh
Defendant:
Marshalls of MA, Inc., The TJX Companies, Inc., The Marmaxx Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
ISON v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04581
Plaintiff:
T. RUTH ISON and TAMMY RUTH ISON
Defendant:
MARMAXX OPERATING CORPORATION also known as THE MARMAXX GROUP AND/OR MARMAXX doing business as THE MARMAXX GROUP AND/OR MARMAXX formerly known as THE MARMAXX GROUP AND/OR MARMAXX, THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., THE MARMAXX GROUP AND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BROADNAX v. TJX COMPANIES AND THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06239
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE BROADNAX
Defendant:
TJX COMPANIES AND THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. , THE TJX OPERATING COMPANIES and THE MARMAXX GROUP AND MARMAXX OPERATING GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01929
Plaintiff:
DANIEL TORRES
Defendant:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. , THE MARMAXX GROUP , RICK GOROSHKO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EZECKIAL v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv06269
Plaintiff:
ALICE EZECKIAL
Defendant:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., THE MARMAXX GROUP, MARSHALLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LORINO et al v. MARSHALLS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv05976
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN LORINO and CLINTON LORINO
Defendant:
MARSHALLS, INC. , THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. , MARMAXX OPERATING CORP. and others
Cross_claimant:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. , MARMAXX OPERATING CORP. , MARMAXX GROUP, INC., USA and others
Cross_defendant:
FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03854
Plaintiff:
KAMIA EDWARDS
Defendant:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. and MARMAXX GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
