Cases 1 - 10 of 43
State of Nebraska et al v. Cliff et al
as 2:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, Arizona State Legislature and others
Defendant:
Steven S. Cliff and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Mike Moyle, Speaker of Idaho House Representatives
as 23-35450
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIKE MOYLE, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, CHUCK WINDER, President Pro Tempore of the Idaho Senate and THE SIXTY-SEVENTH IDAHO LEGISLATURE, Proposed Intevenor-Defendants
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and STATE OF INDIANA, AND 18 OTHER STATES
USA v. State of Idaho
as 23-35440
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and STATE OF INDIANA, AND 18 OTHER STATES
State of Nebraska, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 23-15179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
The United States v. State of Idaho
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
The United States and United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant:
Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae:
New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Ani Gharibian, et al v. Valley Campus Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 21-56253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANI GHARIBIAN, Relator; ex rel United States of America
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY CAMPUS PHARMACY, INC., DBA TNH Advanced Speciality Pharmacy, DIPLOMAT PHARMACY, INC. and OPTUMRX, INC.
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv04155
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Holdings, LLC, Frontier Communications Corporation, Frontier Communications Intermediate, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, The People of the State of California, State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
