Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff:
DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Maloy v. Zynex, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01011
Plaintiff:
Deahona Maloy , State of California, The, State of Connecticut, The and others
Defendant:
Zynex, Inc. and Zynex Medical, Inc
Interested_party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
U.S. Secretary of Defense, U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barbetta v. DaVita, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02175
Plaintiff:
David Barbetta
Defendant:
DaVita, Inc. and Total Renal Care, Inc.
Interested_party:
State of Michigan, USA , Tennessee, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Davis v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv00054
Petitioner:
Wilson Davis
Respondent:
Davis, People of the State of Michigan and Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Schmidt v. Terrell et al
as 5:2007cv03089
Petitioner:
Robert Gustov Schmidt
Respondent:
Duke Terrell and State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
