Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. State of Washington, et al
as 23-35066
Petitioner / Appellant:
STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS
Intervenor / Appellee:
TULALIP TRIBES and NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE
Interested Party:
HOH INDIAN TRIBE, SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY, QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE
Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv05325
Plaintiff:
Maverick Gaming LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Intervenor:
Shoalwater Bay Tribe
Amicus Curiae:
Suquamish Tribe, Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Hoh Indian Tribe and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, et al v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe
as 21-35985
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY
Defendant / Appellant:
SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, TULALIP TRIBES, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE and others
Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty., et al v. Lummi Nation
as 21-35874
Petitioner:
SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY, TULALIP TRIBES and UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE
Respondent:
LUMMI NATION
Appellant:
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE and PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE
Not Classified By Court:
STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS, HOH INDIAN TRIBE, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE and others
Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty., et al v. Lummi Nation
as 21-35812
Petitioner:
SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY, TULALIP TRIBES and UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE
Respondent:
LUMMI NATION
Not Classified By Court:
STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS, HOH INDIAN TRIBE, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE and others
Confederated Tribes, et al v. Steven Mnuchin
as 20-5204
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 20-cv-01059, Tulalip Tribes, Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Napaskiak, Incorporated, St. Mary's Native Corporation, Sea Lion Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven T. Mnuchin, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of the Treasury
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ute Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation, 20-cv-01070
Amicus Curiae:
Cook Inlet Region, Inc., California Tribal Chairperson's Association, California Nations Indian Gaming Association and others
Confederated Tribes, et al v. Steven Mnuchin
as 20-5205
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 20-cv-01059, Nondalton Tribal Council, 20-cv-01059, Rosebud Sioux Tribe, 20-cv-01059 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pueblo of Picuris, Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Tulalip Tribes and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Napaskiak, Incorporated, St. Mary's Native Corporation, Sea Lion Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven T. Mnuchin, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of the Treasury
Amicus Curiae:
California Tribal Chairperson's Association, California Nations Indian Gaming Association, Alaska Federation of Natives and others
Petitioner:
Cook Inlet Region, Inc.
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2019cv06227
Defendant:
Kelly Susewind, Jay Inslee and State of Washington
Plaintiff:
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe
Amicus Curiae:
Suquamish Tribe and Samish Indian Nation
Intervenor Defendant:
The Tulalip Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, et al v. Lummi Nation
as 19-35638
Petitioner:
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE and PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE
Not Yet Classified:
STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE, MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE, UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE and others
Respondent / Appellee:
LUMMI NATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM INDIAN TRIBE
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, et al v. Lummi Nation
as 19-35610
Not Yet Classified:
NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE, LUMMI NATION, STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
