Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Susie Bigger v. Facebook, Inc.
as 19-1944
Defendant / Appellant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUSIE BIGGER
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1855.6 POUNDS OF AMERICAN PADDLEFISH MEAT (ASSET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 17-FWS-000019) AND 982.34 POUNDS OF AMERICAN PADDLEFISH CAVIAR (ASSET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 17-FWS-000017)
as 4:2018cv00207
Defendant:
1855.6 POUNDS OF AMERICAN and 1855.6 POUNDS OF AMERICAN PADDLEFISH MEAT (ASSET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 17-FWS-000019) AND 982.34 POUNDS OF AMERICAN PADDLEFISH CAVIAR (ASSET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 17-FWS-000017)
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3374
Bigger v. Facebook, Inc.
as 1:2017cv07753
Plaintiff:
Susie Bigger
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CHANCE v. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF TOXICOLOGY, INC.
as 1:2015cv01627
Defendant:
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF TOXICOLOGY, INC.
Plaintiff:
DEANNA CHANCE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FOUDRAY v. UNION CITY LODGE #1534 BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2010cv01271
Plaintiff:
SHARON FOUDRAY
Defendant:
UNION CITY LODGE #1534 BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LOPSHIRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
LARRY T. LOPSHIRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Easley v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2007cv03634
Plaintiff:
Latonya Easley
Defendant:
United States Of America, FBI and DEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
