Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,485
In re: Boyd
as 24-6007
Petitioner: RONALD ERIC BOYD
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Bates
as 24-2005
Petitioner: BRADLEY BATES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Ortiz-Lozano
as 23-2198
Petitioner: YOLIA ORTIZ-LOZANO
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: May
as 23-1389
Petitioner: In re: SAMUEL J. MAY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
In re: Lopez-Garcia
as 23-3247
Petitioner: JUAN MANUEL LOPEZ-GARCIA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4150
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee: JUAN AREVALO, an individual, LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, DAVID D. CARRERA, an individual and others
Defendant: JOSEPH DELAROSA, an individual, ADELA MORRISON, an individual, STEVEN D. OLSON, an individual and others
In re: Demos
as 23-8075
Petitioner: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WASHINGSON
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4147
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee: BRYAN L. BOWKER, in his official and individual capacity and JOSEPH MCDADE, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant: LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, KEVIN CLOCK, an individual, PAUL CONABLE, an individual and others
Cross Claimant: STEVEN J. MCDADE, an individual
In House Convenience, LLC v. The United States of America
as 1:2023cv00985
Appellant: In House Convenience, LLC
Appellee: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: Etuk
as 23-5115
Petitioner: In re: IBANGA ETUK
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?