Cases 11 - 20 of 9,607
Line v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Line
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Aleman-Rivera v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Rafael Aleman-Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rivas Nunez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
Tauri Benjamin Rivas Nunez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Richardson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00332
Petitioner:
James Kyle Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Franqui v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
William Franqui
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mizrachy, Michael v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60588
Plaintiff:
Michael Mizrachy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Michel, Jeffrey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21370
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Michel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Flanders v. Tipton et al
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Lavont Flanders, Jr
Defendant:
C. Tipton, E.K. Carlton and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rendon, Daniela v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21344
Plaintiff:
Daniela Rendon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gayden v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
