Cases 11 - 20 of 601
Casillas v. USA
as 2:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Roger Casillas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hartleroad v. USA
as 1:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Kevin Hartleroad
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Antonio Walton and Buck
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burris v. USA
as 1:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Ronnie D Burrus
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burrus v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D Burrus
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ruiz v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Mary A Ruiz
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Randle v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Payne T Randle
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Luis H Jaquez
Defendant:
United States of America
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Nieto v. USA
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Cowboy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Krouse et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mills Krouse, Paige E. Krouse and Daniel Mills Krouse 1989 Trust UAD December 26, 1989
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
