Cases 1 - 7 of 7
THINKDIRECT MARKETING GROUP, INC. v. GRAYSQUARE, INC
as 2:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
THINKDIRECT MARKETING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
GRAYSQUARE, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chung v. Thinkdirect Marketing Group, Inc.
as 8:2019cv01370
Plaintiff:
Chiehen Chung
Defendant:
Thinkdirect Marketing Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson et al v. ThinkDirect Marketing Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03749
Plaintiff:
Samarie Jackson and Anita Peterson
Defendant:
ThinkDirect Marketing Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Elizabeth Heibrink, et al v. Thinkdirect Marketing Group, et al
as 15-15612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L. ROXANA MARION, on behalf of herself and all others, ELIZABETH HEIDBRINK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and CONNIE MCLAUGHLIN
Interested Party - Appellant:
DENISE PALMER, FELICIA CLARK, JAMES RHOADES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THINKDIRECT MARKETING GROUP, INC., a.k.a. Agora Marketing Solutions, Inc., a.k.a. Special Data Processing Corporation, a.k.a. National Magazine Exchange, DENNIS CAHILL, individually, DAVE MACEY, individually and others
:
SERVICE
Heckman v. Thinkdirect Marketing Group, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00680
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Heckman
Defendant:
Thinkdirect Marketing Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scali v. Thinkdirect Marketing Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01919
Plaintiff:
Michael Scali
Defendant:
Thinkdirect Marketing Group, Inc. , Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC , Thomas H. Ripley and others
Mediator:
Mary A. Lau
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Heidbrink et al v. Thinkdirect Marketing Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01232
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Heidbrink and L. Roxana Marion
Defendant:
Thinkdirect Marketing Group, Inc. , Blackstreet Capital Management, LLC , Thomas H. Ripley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
